Star Trek: Philosophical Meaning and How it Relates to the Real World

Star Trek: Philosophical Meaning and How it Relates to the Real World

It has been over 50 years since the original Star Trek series aired, and I think it's time to take a look at what lessons we can learn from this iconic show. We all know that "to boldly go where no man has gone before" is one of the show's most famous quotes, but there are many others that have philosophical meaning. The article will share some of these deep insights into how the world works and how to live a meaningful life without violating our moral principles.

One of the things that makes Star Trek so unique is its philosophical meaning. The show has a lot to teach us about how to live our lives, and it can be applied in the real world. For example, one of the most important lessons is that we should always strive to uphold our moral principles. No matter what situation we find ourselves in, we should always try to do the right thing.

One of the best examples of this can be found in the character of Captain Jean Luc Picard. He always strove to do what's right, even when it placed him at odds with superior officers or government officials. We can all learn a lot from how he approached these situations and tried to make things better for everyone involved. As a representative of humanity before the Q continuum (a race of omnipotent beings), it was especially important that Jean Luc held this trait since if he failed to disprove that humans are a "savage and dangerous race", then the Q would erase humanity from ever having existed. As a literary tool, this narrative works much in the same way that it is written that God chose Noah as a representative of man in the Bible. In the Biblical narrative, God chooses to allow man to continue to exist through the descendants of Noah because of the Noah's actions which showed there was hope that man could do good and abstain from evil much in the same way that Q allows Jean Luc and humanity to continue living with the caveat that they would always be watching his actions with he hope that Jean Luc was right in his belief that man could do good.

What does it mean to be human in a post-scarcity society?

One question that is posed by the lore of the Star Trek Universe is, “what does it mean to be human in a post-scarcity society”? One of the most interesting things about Star Trek is how it deals with technology, such as how since replicators are able to create anything that can fit into their computer memory, scarcity no longer exists. This makes money obsolete because people do not need material possessions anymore. All they require is a replicator and they can have their needs fulfilled. This is problematic though because there's not much need for human labor at that time, so people don't know what to do with themselves in order to contribute to society. This is a problem we are already seeing in the here and now of the 21st century, taking this issue from the world of the philosophical into that of the practical.

People are already struggling to find meaning in work where now AI can replace human beings. With the advent of technology, many jobs that were once done by human beings are now being done by machines. This is causing a lot of people to feel lost and uncertain about their future. They don't know what they're supposed to do with themselves. Currently, some fear that this trend will lead to a decline in humans where masses of people find themselves almost without an extrinsic reason for being alive. Star Trek proposes a solution to this by imagining a world where people are free to pursue their best-selves. Life without scarcity can help people to discover their purposes because there would be no need to have a job just for money or survival, so one's occupation could become more meaningful and fulfilling in an existential sense, which is something we can all agree is a worthy pursuit right? 

What can we learn from Star Trek today about how we live our lives now?

There are many things we can learn from Star Trek today about how we live our lives now. One of the most important lessons is that we should always believe there is a solution to our problems, even if they are large and scary.

Star Trek was able to do this by using the philosophy of infinite diversity in infinite combinations. This is an idea that suggests there are many different ways one can approach a situation, so if your initial plan fails, you should try something else instead of giving up hope. Just because someone has not yet found a solution doesn't mean it's impossible for them to do so. Another important lesson is that we should not be afraid to try new things, even if it means making mistakes or failure because without this willingness to explore the unknown, much of what makes our lives worthwhile would never have come into being in the first place.

If you are interested in finding out more about the philosophy of Star Trek, please visit our website. If you have any questions or comments feel free to contact us on Instagram, where Trekkies gather to discuss all things Star Trek. We hope you have enjoyed this article, and we look forward to bringing you more content in the future.

Have a favorite Star Trek Episode? Let us know in the comments!

Ready to get your own limited run fan art before they are gone forever? Use code "WELCOME10" at checkout for 10% off or just use the link below and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout!

1 comment

  • richard weinstein

    it is interesting that we could learn from other species especially the last series star trek enterprise yet as far as on eat we may be visited by aliens of other planets however we don’t apply the lessons of star trek in this regard we don’t have a check on the supreme court that has no power but published in major newspapers – world publish magazines but I pointed out could be easily be done {with a 23 more women council} but could of been done maybe can still a building and directive for this look like what it was supposed to help blacks back in mid 1990’s now they are taking up private Malita’s clearly a protective fanaticism. clearly there
    is an ad hominin or attack the person (or persons) and not the idea.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published